Having travelled back to the UK for Christmas this week I am a little behind on writing up amusing date stories. As an interlude though I thought I would offer up a brief opinion piece on something I've been thinking a bit about lately. As the title suggests it is on the subject of labels. (Ok it ended up not being that brief... I got caught up in the flow...)
People seem to like sticking labels on each other, in fact
it almost seems telling people they're a 'type' of person, or assigning one's
own personality to a particular brand is becoming a modern obsession. Labels
come in all shapes and sizes. You might say someone is an 'extrovert', a
'slut', a 'type A personality', a 'masochist', a 'liberal', a 'Republican', a
'control-freak', a 'border-line personality' etc etc. You might even get all
wishy washy and type people by their astrological sign, or all pseudo-sciencey
and assign someone a series of letters based on how they score on a personality
test.
In some sense, using labels for people like we use labels
for other objects seems like a reasonable way of making sense of the
complicated world we live in. When interacting with our peers, it's useful to
be able to predict how they will behave in different circumstances, and it’s an
attractive idea that you can pre-empt someone’s future actions based on the
limited things you know about them already.
However, I would like to propose that all existing systems
of personality categorisation are pretty much always worthless bullshit.
While some labels may have value for quickly summarising a
small number of personality traits, I think the general idea that personality
types are a useful way of summarising people is like an infected thorn embedded
in our social consciousness. It’s a way of thinking that has been around for so
long that we assume it serves a function and its merits are too rarely
questioned.
I wonder if the popularity of labelling people is due to a
human desire to be in control of all the information in our lives, and if we
can't assign everyone to neat little personality categories this messiness
makes some of us uncomfortable somehow. Perhaps some folks just need to put
those rubber stamps on people, however inaccurate or misleading, just because
they don’t want to deal with the amount of thought required for gaining a real
appreciation of all the nuanced characters they encounter out in the world.
I think it's fair to use labels to summarise behaviours,
e.g. saying things like: "Dave has a masochistic side", or
"Jeannie was acting slutty last night"[1].
However the critical thing is always recognising that a specific personality
trait is just a small facet of any person, and to label a whole individual,
e.g.; "Dave the masochist" or "Jeannie the slut" is a toxic
way of thinking. Many people also lack a certain empathetic plasticity in how
they deal with other humans, and once you assign someone a label it's as if
they can somehow be written off; "Dave's a masochist. Masochists like
pain. Something just fucked him up when he was young. I don't need to acquire
any further understanding of Dave as I know what Masochists are like, therefore
I know what Dave's like." Or more simply: "I don't like Masochist's,
so I won't like Dave." It takes a certain kind of arrogance to make these
assumptions, and it’s an arrogance that I fear is all too prevalent. We should
never underestimate someone’s capacity to surprise us.
When I say personality categorisation is worthless bovine
excrement, I'm not trying to imply that it’s impossible to put people into
loose groupings based on similar traits. However, what we need to acknowledge
is that personalities are made up of a very large number of behavioural
tendencies. People's tendencies then fall somewhere along various analogue
spectra, and can often shift position unpredictably. As I see things this makes
it completely impossible to draw solid lines around groups of individuals and tease
them apart from the grand fractal tapestry of human nature.
Someone might argue that there's some usefulness in trying
to make simplified 'digital' groups out of these 'analogue' mixtures, but in my
opinion a filing system where someone can be in one folder one day and a
different folder the next is a waste of time. Why not just give everyone their
own folder? Then add notes as you get to know someone and not before.
I think it's particularly important to stay away from
personality labels when dealing with sexuality and sexual interests, just
because there are so many prejudices floating around out there.
For example, when I talk about sleeping with someone on the
first date, often people imagine that I must have been on a date with a certain
"type" of girl. Sometimes the reflex response is "I'm not sure
they'd be my type" or "I'm not that type of girl"... Fine you
want to get to know someone before sleeping with them, I can see many arguments
to support that, and I used to think that way myself. However, fuck the
assumption that there's a specific "type" of girl who will sleep with
a guy on a first date. Also don't think for one second that promiscuous
behaviour can predict one single thing about the rest of their personality.
Of the people I've been out with[2], and
the small subset that I've slept with on the first date, I couldn't put any two
of these girls in one single personality category. In fact, there have barely
been any similarities between them at all. Some might assume that my kinky sex
profile might also attract a certain subsection[3] of the
psychological strata, and that girls interested in being dominated might all
have key traits in common. However, instead I have met a genuine diversity of
individuals through my kinky profile. Several girls self-identified as
"type A" personalities and considered themselves dominant in the workplace
etc, but some girls were more quiet and submissive in their mannerisms. In fact
most were just laid back normal people. Some dates might describe their
personality as more dominant or submissive (as if they HAVE to be one or the
other), but they often struck me as pretty well balanced. Thus, I have
concluded that there are no hard and fast rules about the sorts of people
interested in kinky sex, and no soft and slow ones either.
My general conclusion to this diversion then is that
everyone really is an individual. Our multitudinous human traits make it
impossible to meaningfully categorise anyone as a ‘type’. For some reason,
people seem to like assigning themselves to categories. The simplest one being
"Am I a good or bad person?" Fuck that shit, you’re just a person,
you can be a person who does good stuff or one who does bad stuff, and that can
even depend on the kind of day you’re having. You're just you and no label is
ever going to capture that.
You may like this philosophy or you may not, but personally
I can’t help but think that all this human complexity makes the world just that
little bit more exciting to live in.
[1]
The word 'slut' and prejudices against sexual active people deserve ranty
asides all of their own, but for now let’s focus on the general notion of
labelling people.
[2]
The chapters of this book don't do any of my date's justice. I can only show
you a few small facets at a time, and also it doesn't help that I forget a lot
of the interesting details from conversations we had.
[3]
Pun not really intended… but
I’m going to leave it there anyway.
